Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer

Panda Dome (Panda Free Antivirus) is an evolution of first cloud antivirus, based on Collective Intelligence. panda free antivirus download. Important info for Windows Vista users · Get complete protection for Windows Vista · Official Windows Vista antivirus · The people have spoken · How to install. Panda Antivirus Pro 21.00.00 Crack + Activation Key Full Download 2022 Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack + License Keys Free Premium Panda.

: Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer

AIRFLOW CRACKED WINDOWS - CRACK KEY FOR U
Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer
F.LUX AND 2019 - CRACK KEY FOR U
RecordPad Sound Recorder 8.01 Registration Code Crack

Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer -

Panda Dome Antivirus Download for Free - 2021 Latest Version

Written by: Shauli Zacks

Download the free Panda Dome antivirus and you’ll get an easy to use program with 100% virus detection rate. It has a strong firewall that does a good job of blocking cyberattacks from gaining access to personal data on your computer.

  1. Go directly to the official Panda Security website and download the Panda Dome Antivirus software for free
  2. Click on the Download button to begin the download.
    Download Panda
  3. You might get a pop-up message with the latest paid plan, you can ignore this and continue to your free download.
  4. You’ll be redirected to a 3rd party website that hosts the download file.
  5. Once again you’ll have to click the DOWNLOAD button – but this time the file will download on your computer.
  6. Double click or choose to run the file and the installation program will open.
  7. Follow the steps and then click Accept & Install and the installation will automatically begin.

Panda Installer

Download Panda Dome Security for Free!

3 Steps to Uninstall Panda Dome Antivirus from Windows

If Panda isn’t right for you, you can completely remove it from your computer in 3 easy steps. Since you’ll still need protection from cyber threats, check out these free alternatives below.

  1. Type Add or Remove Programs in the Windows search bar of your computer.
    Add or Remove Program
  2. Scroll down and find Panda Dome and click uninstall.
    Uninstall Panda
  3. After you give the system permission to change your setting, Panda will try one more time to check if you’re sure you want to remove the program. If you are, click YES.

After the uninstallation is complete, a survey from Panda will open in your web browser. You can answer the questions if you want, or just exit the page.

With a 100% virus detection rate, Panda Dome is one of the most powerful free antivirus programs I’ve tested. It has a good selection of features and I found it very easy to use. There is no need to worry about advanced settings or learning how to use it. As you can see in the image below, the dashboard is very organized and free from clutter.

Panda Dome Dashboard

Customize Your Scans

There are a few different scanning options.

Panda Scan Levels

  • Critical Area – This is a quick, but important scan that looks at the computer’s memory, processes that are running, cookies, and other areas where a virus may be operating.
  • Full Scan – A deep scan that inspects every folder and file on your computer.
  • Customize – You can choose which folders to scan. This is a good feature if you’ve downloaded something that you fear may contain a virus or malware.
  • USB Scan – You won’t have to worry about installing a virus or malware through the USB port. Just turn on the USB Drive Protection and Panda will automatically scan all devices that are plugged into your USB.

You can either manually start the scan or create a schedule of when the scan should start. There is no limit to how many times you can schedule a scan per week. So if, for example, you want to have a critical scan twice a week and a detailed scan once a week, just create the schedule and you’ll never have to worry about it again.

Panda Scan Options

Panda will quarantine any suspicious files it finds and holds them for a week for you to inspect. You can either remove them manually, restore them if you believe the file isn’t dangerous, or have the program delete it after a week in quarantine.

Panda is working even when the scan isn’t running. It’s blocking viruses and malware from infecting your computer. It will scan every file before you can download and install it. There is also a Process Monitor feature that is always checking the processes that are running on your computer, to ensure that they don’t get infected or attacked.

Panda Process Monitor

Download Panda Dome Security for Free!

Limited VPN Protection

A VPN is an excellent way to protect your privacy and data on your computer. When you download Panda it includes a free VPN, with a daily limit of 150MB per day and access to a few different servers. While that won’t last very long if you want a VPN for watching Netflix, streaming, or gaming, it should be enough if your goal is to protect your computer while using public wifi, or for light browsing. (If you want the best VPN, check out our ExpressVPN review).

  • Avira: One of the most complete free antivirus programs, Avira has nearly a 100% detection rate for all types of viruses and malware. Download it today and get 30 days of Avira Premium for free. It also includes online security tools, such as a VPN, secure firewall, and a system optimizer that cleans od and unused software from your computer to improve performance.
  • Bitdefender: An extremely easy-to-use free antivirus program, Bitdefender will work to protect your device 24/7. Run a comprehensive scan of your entire system, or select a specific file or folder to scan. While it’s lacking any advanced features, based on independent testing, Bitdefender has a nearly 100% virus and detection rate.

?Is Panda Dome really free?

While there is a pro version that has additional features, Panda Dome also offers a completely free antivirus software. It includes all the basic features that you would expect from a free antivirus, plus some advanced features like a VPN, Rescue Kit, and USB scanning.

?Is Panda Dome safe?

Panda Dome is 100% safe to download and use on your computer. Not only is it safe to use, but it will protect you from viruses, ransomware, spyware, trojans, and dangerous URLs.

?How do I temporarily disable Panda Antivirus?

Click on the “Hamburger” button on the Panda Dome dashboard and then click on the setting gear. You’ll see a list of setting options, click on Antivirus and the first option is “Enable Permanent Protection”, turn it off, and the antivirus will be disabled. Don’t forget to restart the permanent protection after you’re done doing whatever you were doing that required your antivirus protection to be disabled.

?Is there a free Panda Dome package for Mac?

Panda Dome does have a Mac application. Unfortunately, at this time there is no completely free option, but you can try it out for free for the first month.

Visit Panda Dome Antivirus Website
Panda Dome Antivirus9.7 3.07MB 1,002,498 Panda Security Download
Источник: https://www.wizcase.com/download/panda-dome-antivirus/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community ... a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,280 articles, 42,573,941 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia ... are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people ... And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,280

Cebuano 6,061,619

Swedish 2,872,837

German 2,633,512

French 2,374,985

Dutch 2,071,672

Russian 1,771,487

Spanish 1,731,929

Italian 1,726,585

Polish 1,496,935

Egyptian Arabic 1,378,106

Japanese 1,301,041

Vietnamese 1,270,100

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,658

Arabic 1,143,507

Ukrainian 1,123,328

Portuguese 1,077,410

Persian 846,692

Catalan 689,830

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red Americas.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency ... We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority ... (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

Antivirus

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]: Panda Antivirus protects the system even when you are browsing the website or working on your system. The best part about this anti-virus software is that it will work in such a way that you will not even notice that it is running in the background. The software is very light-weight in nature and the reason for this is because all the work is done on the cloud. As compared to all the new antiviruses that are present in the market, the Panda antivirus gives you protection against all the viruses and this happens because of its cloud scanning feature that is a very important part of the Panda labservers. Panda believes that in order to provide better services to its customers, they will have to collect information on your usage of the system as it helps them in performing the analysis in a better manner.

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

What are the features of Panda Antivirus software?

  1. A very important feature of this anti-virus software is that you have to install it and not worry about it. The user will never have to worry about any updates, any configurations that are part of the updating system.
  2. It also includes creature comforts like that of VPN client and it also has an interruption-free gaming mode.
  3. In the free edition, the users will also get a behavioral analysis engine that will take care of the entire system.
  4. Panda Dome: It is an application that helps you in managing everything that is associated with your Panda account. It also takes care of all the Panda products that are associated with your account in one way or the other. Also, the user should understand that you will be active even if you do not have a Panda account or even if you do not wish to open an account.
  5. This antivirus ensures that you get real-time protection against all the types of viruses and malware. All the users will get access to the scanning module, they will also be able to monitor all the active processes that will help them in understanding if there is any suspicious activity going or not. It will also take care of all the USB based virus attacks. Not only this, but it will also take create an emergency boot in the USB drive and will work if your Windows refuses to start.
  6. This antivirus software will do a full check up on your system and will check against all the viruses and malware, but it will verify only those that are there in hidden mode. It will also quickly scan all the files that you have selected, this also includes folders and other drives.
  7. The latest version uses three level of protection. The scanner that is part of the program checks all the new files and tries to find out if there is any new virus attack or not. If there is any suspicious activity, it will be uploaded on the website of the company which will be followed by a detailed analysis by the company.

What will you learn about

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

So without wasting any time let’s Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 offline installer with the help of the below-listed links:

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

Technical Details Of Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

Latest VersionPanda Free Antivirus 18.06.00
File NameFREEAV.exe
File Size61.45 MB
LicenseFree
Supported OSWindows 10, Windows 8, Windows 7
AuthorPanda Security

Recommended For you:

That’s it you have finally check out this article; Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer], but if you have any questions then feel free ask them in the comment’s section.

Источник: https://file.wiki/download-panda-free-antivirus-18-06-00-offline-installer/

Panda Dome Free Antivirus software review for 2020

panda dome freepanda dome free

Panda Free Antivirus, also known as Panda Free Antivirus, is a piece of software developed by Panda Security. It is the 18th version of this program. The anti-malware application is available only for Windows.  One thing that makes Panda Free Antivirus different from other products in the market is that it begins scanning you PC the very first second it is installed. The scan runs very smoothly, so it shouldn’t slow down your computer.

ProsConsVerdict
Great detection score of viruses and malware programsStill has a noticeable impact on system performanceAn attractive virus detection tool designed for better than average computers
Rescue disk tool which can work fine under difficult conditionsSome of the default settings need to be changed to make the software more efficient
USB stick vaccination tool which works better than most competitors
A convenient user interface that can be customized

Panda Free Antivirus provides protection against cyber threats while you work, play or browse online. Free Panda solutions are compatible with Windows and Android devices. In addition, Panda offers paid security solutions including Panda Dome Essential, Panda Dome Advanced, Panda Dome Complete and Panda Dome Premium. Panda Free Antivirus for Windows is compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8/8.1, Windows 7, Windows Vista and Windows XP (SP3or later)

Download and Install Panda Antivirus easily

It is really simple to download and install this anti-malware app. You can easily download it from this page. When you have the setup file, click it (it may be located in your Downloads folder). Read all the information presented by the Installation Wizard. Follow the steps it provides. Most of the time you will simply need to click on the 'Next' button. 

Panda Dome activate

Antivirus protection is not that bad accordint to the tests

Panda’s antivirus defenses rely on the standard malware detection techniques including a traditional malware-signature detection engine in order to catch widespread malware and heuristic monitoring that checks for suspicious behaviors. All suspicious icons are sent to the company’s cloud-based Collective Intelligence servers for further investigation. Panda Free Antivirus introduced the cloud technology with this new version of the software[3]. Cloud processing is comparatively better for those who do not want to see updates that would slow down their PCs and it also eliminates the surprise scans that can make your user experience uncomfortable for quite some time.

Panda Free Antivirus did not participate in the most recent antivirus test, conducted by the AV-TEST testing lab. However, the antivirus package was tested this year and it demonstrated almost perfect malware detection rates, as it successfully detected 100% of zero-day malware attacks and 99.8% of widespread and prevalent malware. However, Panda delivered 3 false positives. Panda Free Antivirus also has a built-in anti-phishing[4] engine which helps to fight against fraudulent sites that are trying to steal your personal information, including credit card numbers, bank account info, etc. This type of protection is extremely important these days when there are more fraudulent websites than ever.

There is an integrated anti-phishing feature.

Some reviewers did a research on Panda Free Antivirus anti-phishing efficiency and the results were not bad – it concluded that Panda Free Antivirus is at the top half of products when it comes to anti-phishing.

Panda Offers many security Features in their free version

Antivirus Protection, including Real-Time Protection, which protects users against all types of malware and spyware. Users can schedule scans periodically or scan the system on demand. The free package also protects the system by preventing the automatic execution of threats from USB drives – USB Protection. The vaccination tool can easily quarantine viruses and malware which come from USB drives and other attached devices. Although you can run this tool manually, lots of experts recommend changing the settings to make it run automatically.  Another useful tool we can find in the new Panda Free Antivirus is the Process Monitor. It identifies each process that is currently running on your system. It also determines if the process uses a secure connection and terminates it if it doesn’t. However, if you are sure that the process is safe, you can turn it back on. In addition, Panda Rescue Kit allows users to run an advanced scan of the PC or even create a rescue USB drive to clean infected computers.

Panda Free Antivirus also has a solution for emergency cases – let’s say you have a computer that’s locked by some dangerous malware and you cannot enter the safe mode[2]. In this case, Panda lets you make an emergency USB drive with the Panda Cloud Cleaner technology. This tool has been rated as more effective than its current competitors in the market by several IT professionals and reviewers. Panda Free Antivirus introduced the cloud technology with this new version of the software.

Cloud processing is fairly better for those, who do not want to see updates that would slow down their PCs and it also eliminates the surprise scans that can make your user experience uncomfortable for quite some time. Panda Free also includes a free VPN service. Finally, Multimedia/Gaming Mode allows users to play or watch movies or other media without any interruptions. Cloud processing is fairly better for those, who do not want to see updates that would slow down their PCs and it also eliminates the surprise scans that can make your user experience uncomfortable for quite some time. The user interface is quite good-looking and convenient, yet it isn’t simple – the dashboard has movable tiles, so that means you are able to choose which features to see first and even remove the ones you do not use.

Panda Dome Safe Browsing

System-performance impact and scans

However, it would be a lie to say that the new version of Panda Antivirus doesn’t affect your Windows OS speed. You might not feel any difference if you are using a business class PC or laptop, but any device with average and low specifications will definitely be affected, so if you want an antivirus program that runs smoothly in different conditions, Panda Antivirus may not satisfy your needs. According to AV-TEST, in earlier tests, Panda slowed down the installation of frequently-used applications by 47% and hit the system when launching popular websites by 30%, while the market average is 26% and 11%, respectively. When it comes to scanning performance, Panda’s full system scan can take up to three hours, which is one of the slowest results in the market. Panda Dome Scanning

The User interface of free Panda antivirus software is as good as in paid version

The user interface is quite good-looking and convenient, yet it isn’t simple – the dashboard has movable tiles, so which means you are able to choose which features you will see first and even remove the ones you do not use. Another decent thing about the user interface is that it’s totally different than others – while most software has either white or slate gray backgrounds around their components in the dashboard, Panda Antivirus inspires you by using beautiful pictures of nature. That makes the user interface more attractive and it is a really perfect combination with the fully-customizable tiles.

FeatureScore
Antivirus protectionDecent
Additional featuresA very decent set of extra features for free
System-performance impactHeavy
Scanning performanceSlow scans with a medium impact on a system
User interfacePleasant interface which can be customized

Generally speaking, it’s not hard to indicate the pros and cons of this program – Panda Software is definitely a strong antivirus suite, however, the developers at Panda Security have yet to eliminate the flaws that this software has been known for – all of the previous versions had quite a negative impact on the system performance and this one doesn’t break the rule, even though it is based on cloud processing technology.

Customer reviews

There are lots of customer reviews for Panda Antivirus on the Internet. On Trustpilot, it has a rating of 8.3, which is considered as 'Great'.

The majority of users have no problems with Panda Antivirus.

Many reviewers state that they haven't had any problems with the app since its installation. There are instances when Panda caught PC threats that other anti-malware programs couldn't detect. One user points out that the software has the option for one-month subscription without any contracts, and that it is convenient on a tight budget. Some negative reviews focus on troubles during the installation of the program and problems with the subscription payment. Basically, there are no complaints about the security level. 

Panda free is an excellent free antivirus software for home users

All in all, Panda Free Antivirus is a strong program that can provide you with almost perfect virus and malware detection rates, an attractive user-friendly interface and some unusual features like the vaccination tool or the rescue kit. Another strong point of the software is the light weight of the installation file that doesn’t take up much space on your hard drive. All of the features work fast and the cloud-based processing technology makes it even faster. However, the developers at Panda Security still have to work through some flaws when it comes to system performance – it still makes it run slower, that’s why Panda Antivirus could be recommended for users that have a better than average PC set or a business class lapto

About the author

Panda Dome Files scanned
Источник: https://reviewedbypro.com/panda-free-antivirus/

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome)

Handy and approachable antivirus solution that uses cloud assistance to prevent, detect and eliminate infected files while remaining light on resources

Panda Free Antivirusis a very simple-to-use anti-malware application that resorts to cloud technology to rapidly find and prevent Trojans, worms, viruses, spyware, adware and other forms of malicious activity, without sacrificing PC performance. It has been warmly received by the user community in the past, and the latest edition offers a more accessible approach to malware scanning and virus detection.

Speedy installation with third-party offers

The setup procedure takes little time to finish. However, users should be careful when going through the wizard stages, as Panda Free Antivirus offers to download and install third-party utilities that it does not actually need to work properly. By paying a little attention, they can be avoided. In addition, it automatically creates an entry into the Windows Explorer right-click menu, although this is not mentioned anywhere in the setup.

Basic security measures for real-time protection

Panda Free Antivirus is deployed along with Panda Dome, a centralized app to help you manage all the Panda products associated to your account from a single interface. In other words, Panda Free Antivirus is active even if you choose not to login to your Panda account or don't own such an account.

The antivirus ensures real-time protection against various types of threats. Statistics show the total files scanned and quarantined, along with blocked threats. Users may access the scanning module, monitor active processes for suspicious activity, deflect USB-based virus attacks, as well as create an emergency boot USB drive in case Windows refuses to start.

Various scanning modes and customization

Panda Free Antivirus can perform a full checkup on the computer for malware agents, verify only popular hiding areas in critical scan mode, look only into specific directories and drives, as well as quickly scan selected files, folders and drives via the Windows Explorer context menu.

Novices may apply the default configuration with optimized settings when performing scan jobs, while advanced users have the possibility of tinkering with this arrangement when it comes to compressed files, behavioral blocking, automatic virus neutralization, alerts, exclusions, and so on. The real-time guard can be deactivated at any time, while scans can be scheduled to run automatically.

Performance and conclusion

Our most recent tests have revealed that Panda Free Antivirus does an excellent job when it comes to identifying infected files while remaining light on system resources. However, it may take a very long time to get rid of them, depending on their volume. The way we see it is that regular users who do not usually explore the depths of the Internet will most likely be satisfied with Panda Free Antivirus, but the adventurers will probably turn their heads to something more reliable.

Filed under

Malware ScannerVirus ScanFree AntivirusPandaAntivirusScanRemover

Download Hubs

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome) is part of these download collections: Free Antivirus

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome)was reviewed by Elena Opris
Источник: https://www.softpedia.com/get/Antivirus/Panda-Cloud-Antivirus.shtml

Panda Antivirus for Windows and Mac

Panda Antivirus 2021 Download for Windows and Mac Latest Version

Panda Antivirus 2021 Download for Windows and Mac Latest Version – Panda Free Antivirus 18.1.0 free Download Latest version. The brand-new Panda Free Antivirus supplies the easiest-to-use and most user-friendly protection for your computer system. Mount it and neglect concerning infections, spyware, root-kits, cyberpunks and also on-line scams. Panda Free Antivirus will certainly make the finest decisions for you to keep your PC shielded.

Panda Free Antivirus supplies vital protection versus spyware, phishing (on the internet scams), root-kits (stealth techniques) and banker Trojans. Real-time defense provides you with total security against known and also unknown viruses. Conversation, share pictures and also videos, shop online, review your favored blog sites or simply browse the Web with total satisfaction and without disruption.

Panda Antivirus 2021 Download for Windows and Mac Latest Version

Panda Free Antivirus Review

Download Panda Antivirus Latest Version – Panda Free Antivirus secures you while you search, play or function and also you will not even see it. It is exceptionally light as all the job is done in the cloud. Panda Free Antivirus provides you with the fastest defense against the newest infections many thanks to its cloud-scanning from PandaLabs’ web servers. Panda Free Antivirus is absolutely install and fail to remember. Don’t stress concerning updates, configuration or complex decisions ever again.

Panda Free Antivirus features:

  • Cloud-based sanitation engine.
  • Behavior evaluation engine in the free version.
  • Boosted offline security.
  • Refine screen enables seeing Web links on a per procedure basis.
  • Enhanced efficiency and also 50% faster scans.
  • New advanced setup choices such as requesting for verification prior to reducing the effects of.
  • Compatibility with Windows XP, Panorama, Windows 7, 8, 8.1 as well as Windows 10 (32-bit and 64-bit).
  • Capacity to take care of different licenses.

What’s New:

  • New UI completely upgraded.
  • Improved registration as well as tool administration integrated in the item. Users could manage their registrations and their anti-theft defense (My Gadgets area) from their items.
  • Totally suitable with the brand-new Windows 10 Wedding anniversary Update.
  • Engine improvements for much better security and also efficiency.
  • Other renovations requested by Panda Neighborhood.

Panda Free Antivirus Download Latest Version

Download below panda free antivirus new version for windows and Mac OS X.

  • OS: Windows XP, Vista, 7, Windows 8, 8.1, 10 (32-bit – 64-bit)
  • Website: http://www.pandasecurity.com/
  • Download For Windows: FREEAV.exe
  • Download For Mac OS : PAV4MAC.dmg

Similar Search:

  • download panda for pc 2021

Technical information

»

Publish Date

20 October 2020

Источник: https://softfamed.com/panda-antivirus-download/

Panda Antivirus is the best antivirus developed by the Spanish company Panda Security that is specialized in providing IT security solutions. The TruePrevent technology is being used in developing Panda security products. This technology has the capabilities that can automatically detect, analyze, classify the security threats in real time along with blocking known issues quickly. Panda Antivirus offline installer direct download links are available in this blog post.

You can download Panda offline installerand use it if you don’t have an active Internet connection or you are having the problem of slow Internet speed. Panda Antivirus offline update is recommended if you want Panda antivirus installation on multiple devices having same Operating Systems.

Panda Antivirus offline installer download will help you to protect your system and important data from cyber security threats, viruses, and malware. Panda antivirus protection is available for home users as well as businesses. Download Panda free antivirus offline installer and make your important credentials protected.

You may also like:

Panda Antivirus Pro Offline Installer

Panda Antivirus Pro offline installer helps you to stay protected against all types of threats such as viruses, malware or other security issues. It provides the real-time protection to all your devices connected to your network. Panda Pro Antivirus free download link is available here which will provide you the following features:

  • Protection against every type of security threat whether it is known or unknown.
  • Detects vulnerabilities in Wi-Fi network.
  • Secure the communications.
  • Protection against online fraud, identity theft, and phishing attempts.
  • Security from hackers and intruders with the help of bidirectional firewall.

If these features suit your requirements, click on below given Panda Pro Antivirus free download offline installer link. The trial is available so that you can check the performance of Panda Antivirus Pro.

Download Panda Antivirus Pro (Size: 64.44 MB)

Panda Internet Security Offline Installer

Panda Internet Security is the best option for those who are involved in online trading and want advanced protection against cyber threats. Panda Internet Security offline installer offers you the following features:

  • Protection against online fraud, identity theft, and phishing attempts.
  • Impose barrier against massive ransomware threats with the help of data shield.
  • Data backup facility.
  • Parental control facility to protect the family from inappropriate content.
  • Security of data and systems while surfing and playing online.
  • Safe sharing of files, documents, photos and other important information.

You can download Panda Internet Security offline installer from below-given link.

Download Panda Internet Security (Size: 65.43 MB)

Panda Global Protection Offline Installer

Panda Global Protection is the best antivirus software with real-time protection against all types of security threats. It incorporates more advanced features as compared to the products discussed above. Panda Global Protection offline installer is available here, which can be used multiple times even without Internet connectivity.

Panda Global Protection has following features:

  • Protection against all types of viruses, malware, ransomware and other security threats.
  • Availability of Anchor mode which ensures the location of your device all the time. It allows you to lock your device remotely in case of theft or lost. You can even find your device easily.
  • The feature of file encryption which lets you secure your important documents and files stored on internal or external drives.
  • Delete the unwanted data properly so that nobody can recover it back even with forensic tools and hacking techniques.
  • Master password facility to avoid remembering a bunch of passwords.
  • Parental control facility to protect the family from inappropriate content.
  • Optimize device performance by cleaning cookies & temporary files and removing invalid registry keys.
  • Standard Technical support services from Panda experts.

Download Panda Global Protection (Size: 65.42 MB)

Panda Gold Protection Offline Installer

Panda Gold Protection is the ultimate antivirus that incorporates more advanced features than above-discussed products. You can download Panda Gold Protection offline installer and get the Panda protection against latest security threats. It has following features:

  • Availability of Anchor mode which ensures the location of your device all the time. It allows you to lock your device remotely in case of theft or lost. You can even find your device easily.
  • Standard Technical support services from Panda experts.
  • Premium support and premium live chat support.
  • The feature of file encryption which lets you secure your important documents and files stored on internal or external drives.
  • Impose barrier against massive ransomware threats with the help of data shield to provide you security while using social sites. Your shared data will be kept safe & secure.
  • Delete the unwanted data completely so that nobody can recover it back even with forensic tools and hacking techniques.
  • Parental control facility to protect the family from inappropriate content.
  • Data backup facility.
  • Availability of File Shredder feature.
  • Protection against online fraud, identity theft, and phishing attempts.
  • Wi-Fi network protection.
  • Master password facility to avoid remembering a bunch of passwords.
  • Cross-platform data storage facility (Panda cloud drive and contact backup).

If you want ultimate protection just choose this product. Download Panda Antivirus offline installer and use it multiple times on multiple Windows 10 PCs.

Download Panda Gold Protection (Size: 65.40 MB)

In case you find any problem while downloading Panda Antivirus offline installer, let us know via comments. We will assist you in resolving the issues.

Categories offline installerTags ANTIVIRUS, offline installer, panda, Panda offline installerИсточник: https://www.digitalriser.com/download-panda-antivirus-offline-installer.html

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

Antivirus

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]: Panda Antivirus protects the system even when you are browsing the website or working on your system. The best part about this anti-virus software is that it will work in such a way that you will not even notice that it is running in the background. The software is very light-weight in nature and the reason for this is because all the work is done on the cloud. As compared to all the new antiviruses that are present in the market, the Panda antivirus gives you protection against all the viruses and this happens because of its cloud scanning feature that is a very important part of the Panda labservers. Panda believes that in order to provide better services to its customers, they will have to collect information on your usage of the system as it helps them in performing avast mobile security activation code for android free analysis in a better manner.

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

What are the features of Panda Antivirus software?

  1. A very important feature of this anti-virus software is that you have to install it and not worry about it. The user will never have to worry about any updates, any configurations that are part of the updating system.
  2. It also includes creature comforts like that of VPN client and it also has an interruption-free gaming mode.
  3. In the free edition, the users will also get a behavioral analysis engine that will take care of the entire system.
  4. Panda Dome: It is an application that helps you in managing everything that is associated with your Panda account. It also takes care of all the Panda products that are associated with your account in one way or the other. Also, the user should understand that you will be active even if you do not have a Panda account or even if you do not wish to open an account.
  5. This antivirus ensures that you get real-time protection against all the types of viruses and malware. All the users will get access to the scanning module, they will also be able to monitor all the active processes that will help them in understanding if there is any suspicious activity going or not. It will also take care of all the USB based virus attacks. Not only this, but it will also take create an emergency boot in the USB drive and will work if your Windows refuses to start.
  6. This antivirus software will do a full check up on your system and will check against all the viruses and malware, but it will verify only those that are there in hidden mode. It will also quickly scan express vpn activation code generator the files that you have selected, this also includes folders and other drives.
  7. The latest version uses three level of protection. The scanner that is part of the program checks all the new files and tries to find out if there is any new virus attack or not. If there is any suspicious activity, it will be uploaded on the website of the company which will be followed by a detailed analysis by the company.

What will you learn about

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer]

So without wasting any time let’s Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 offline installer with the help of the below-listed links:

Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

Technical Details Of Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00

Latest VersionPanda Free Antivirus 18.06.00
File NameFREEAV.exe
File Size61.45 MB
LicenseFree
Supported OSWindows 10, Windows 8, Windows 7
AuthorPanda Security

Recommended For you:

That’s it you have finally check out this article; Download Panda Free Antivirus 18.06.00 [Offline Installer], but if you have any questions then feel free ask them in the comment’s section.

Источник: https://file.wiki/download-panda-free-antivirus-18-06-00-offline-installer/

Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer Panda Dome Antivirus Download for Free - 2021 Latest Version

Written by: Shauli Zacks

Download the free Panda Dome antivirus and you’ll get an easy to use program with 100% virus detection rate. It has a strong firewall that does a good job of blocking cyberattacks from gaining access to personal data on your computer.

  1. Go directly to the official Panda Security website and download the Panda Dome Antivirus software for free
  2. Click on the Download button to begin the download.
    Download Panda
  3. You might get a pop-up message with the latest paid plan, you can ignore this and continue to your free download.
  4. You’ll be redirected to a 3rd party website that hosts the download file.
  5. Once again you’ll have to click the DOWNLOAD button – but this time the file will download on your computer.
  6. Double click or choose to run the file and the installation program will open.
  7. Follow the steps and then click Accept & Install and the installation will automatically begin.

Panda Installer

Download Panda Dome Security for Free!

3 Steps to Uninstall Panda Dome Antivirus from Windows

If Panda isn’t right for you, you can completely remove it from your computer in 3 easy steps. Since you’ll still need protection from cyber threats, check out these free alternatives below.

  1. Type Add or Remove Programs in the Windows search bar of your computer.
    Add or Remove Program
  2. Scroll down and find Panda Dome and click uninstall.
    Uninstall Panda
  3. After you give the system permission to change your setting, Panda will try one more time to check if you’re sure you want to remove the program. If you are, click YES.

After the uninstallation is complete, a survey from Panda will open in your web browser. You can answer the questions if you want, or just exit the page.

With a 100% virus detection rate, Panda Dome is one of the most powerful free antivirus programs I’ve tested. It has a good selection of features and I found it very easy to use. There is no need to worry about advanced settings or learning how to use it. As you can see in the image below, the dashboard is very organized and free from clutter.

Panda Dome Dashboard

Customize Your Scans

There are a few different scanning options.

Panda Scan Levels

  • Critical Area – This is a quick, but important scan that looks at the computer’s memory, processes that are running, cookies, and other areas where a virus may be operating.
  • Full Scan – A deep scan that inspects every folder and file on your computer.
  • Customize – You can choose which folders to scan. This is a good feature if you’ve downloaded something that you fear may contain a virus or malware.
  • USB Scan – You won’t have to worry about installing a virus or malware through the USB port. Just turn on the USB Drive Protection and Panda will automatically scan all devices that are plugged into your USB.

You can either manually start the scan or create a schedule of when the scan should start. There is no limit to how many times you can schedule a scan per week. So if, for example, you want to have a critical scan twice a week and a detailed scan once a week, just create the schedule and you’ll never have to worry about it again.

Panda Scan Options

Panda will quarantine any suspicious files it finds and holds them for a week for you to inspect. You can either remove them manually, restore them if you believe the file isn’t dangerous, or have the program delete it after a week in quarantine.

Panda is working even when the scan isn’t running. It’s blocking viruses and malware from infecting your computer. It will scan every file before you can download and install it. There is also a Process Monitor feature that is always checking the processes that are running on your computer, to ensure that they don’t get infected or attacked.

Panda Process Monitor

Download Panda Dome Security for Free!

Limited VPN Protection

A VPN is an excellent way to protect your privacy and data on your computer. When you download Panda it includes a free VPN, with a daily limit of 150MB per day and access to a few different servers. While that won’t last very long if you want a VPN for watching Netflix, streaming, or gaming, it should be enough if your goal is to protect your computer while using public wifi, or for light browsing. (If you want the best VPN, check out our ExpressVPN review).

  • Avira: One of the most complete free antivirus programs, Avira has nearly a 100% detection rate for all types of viruses and malware. Download it today and get 30 days of Avira Premium for free. It also includes online security tools, such as a VPN, secure firewall, and a system optimizer that cleans od and unused software from your computer to improve performance.
  • Bitdefender: An extremely easy-to-use free antivirus program, Bitdefender will work to protect your device 24/7. Run a comprehensive scan of your entire system, or select a specific file or folder to scan. While it’s lacking any advanced features, based on independent testing, Bitdefender has a nearly 100% virus and detection rate.

?Is Panda Dome really free?

While there is a pro version that has additional features, Panda Dome also offers a completely free antivirus software. It includes all the basic features that you would expect from a free antivirus, plus some advanced features like a VPN, Rescue Kit, and USB scanning.

?Is Panda Dome safe?

Panda Dome is 100% safe to download and use on your computer. Not only is it safe to use, but it will protect you from viruses, ransomware, spyware, trojans, and dangerous URLs.

?How do I temporarily disable Panda Antivirus?

Click on the “Hamburger” button on the Panda Dome dashboard and then click on the setting gear. You’ll see a list of setting options, click on Antivirus and the first option is “Enable Permanent Protection”, turn it off, and the antivirus will be disabled. Don’t forget to restart the permanent protection after you’re done doing whatever you were doing that required your antivirus protection to be disabled.

?Is there a free Panda Dome package for Mac?

Panda Dome does have a Mac application. Unfortunately, at this time there is no completely free option, but you can try it out for free for the first month.

Visit Panda Dome Antivirus Website
Panda Dome Antivirus9.7 3.07MB 1,002,498 Panda Security Download
Источник: https://www.wizcase.com/download/panda-dome-antivirus/

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack With Activation Code [Latest] Free

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack Full Free Download

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack With Activation Code [Latest] Free

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack is the best Antivirus ever. It protects you while working, playing, or browsing online and protects your identity, money, and family with the best Internet security. Also, it allows you to use the Internet freely without any fear. It protects you against viruses, identity theft, online fraud, cybercriminals, and unsolicited emails. Further, it always scans your device to find any contaminated file; this tool shipped it to Panda Cloud. There are two processes concurrently to use the Panda cloud: infected therapeutic information and sending virus sort information to the Panda Cloud server.

Further, Panda Antivirus Pro Crack is an effective antivirus with readily prolonged defenses. It is lightweight and quick software as it uses the cloud technique and Collective intelligence server for scanning. Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 protects your identity while browsing and protects your PC and network against viruses and other threats. Panda Antivirus 2022 allows you to use your mail without any worry about online fraud or spam. It can back up your data; in case of your loss, you can restore it.

Panda Antivirus Pro Crack 2022 With Key Generator Free

Furthermore, it has an Enhanced Firewall. It provides you with control over precisely who and what comes in and out of your PC. Furthermore, Panda offers Ransomware Protection, which is an extra layer of defense against every ransomware attack. Any hackers, ransomware cannot mess with your files, private data, photographs, and passwords. All of these features are provided to you through an easy-to-use interface and access to the modules. It also gives you numerous facial appearances and modules. Moreover, Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Activation Code has different modules that are extremely helpful for a safety system. It can improve your Windows PC’s performance and ensure your online security with real-time connection and scanning downloads. In addition, Panda gives protection against unsecured spots.

Panda Free Antivirus 2022 Crack offers webcam protection, preventing spying hackers from getting to your most personal files and photos or even peeping into your home. Additionally, it secures your data and your private life also. It stops viruses, spyware, ransomware, Trojans, rootkits, and other nasty malware from attacking your devices. In addition, it secures your USB and DVD drives quickly. Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Full Crack is a full security package that protects you as you shop, browse, and communicate. It stops malware, dangerous attachments, bad links, and spam. Also, it provides you encryption safe for sensitive information. Its automatic update system can beat the even latest malware to your PC, and you can protect MAC and Android devices.

Panda Antivirus Pro Crack Plus License Key PC Download

Panda Free Antivirus 2022 Crack has Collective Intelligence technology, which links you with the server where you are all the time up to date with a database of variants of recent viruses from around the globe. With this feature, you can make your PC protected from all new viruses, which all the time seems. The Panda Cloud feature makes your Laptop computer / PC more lightweight, quick, and never overloaded. There are numerous types of risks facing your Devices, but this software can rescue worms, rootkits, etc. Panda Antivirus Crack consists of real-time guards and various scanning modes. It provides additional layers of security to your Devices.

Panda Antivirus Pro Key 2022 provides excellent security against all malware. Due to this fact, there is no possibility that malware can access your device. It always protects you from any rescues, worms, Trojans, and other threats. Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 protects your webcam; no one will allow entering into your webcam. Panda Antivirus protects your PC when you are offline; it scans your file and folders to secure you from virus threats. When an issue is discovered, you need to join the web to clear up the item. This feature makes this Antivirus gentle and quick.

Key Features of Panda Antivirus 2022 Crack:

  • Advanced Firewall. It keeps hackers on the other side of the wall with this essential security feature that monitors and controls what goes in and out of your computer.
  • Parental control. It protects your family from inappropriate content. Second, it gives your kids the freedom to use the Internet; simultaneously, flagging any behavior you feel is inappropriate.
  • Browser Cleaner. Removes browsing traces such as cookies and cache files from top browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Internet Explorer, and more.
  • Software Clean-up. Powered by a cloud-based reputation system, this all-new technology detects and removes bloatware such as toolbars, preinstalled trials, and more.
  • Problem Fixing. Detects and corrects common causes of PC problems, like unsafe user accounts, control settings, and outdated file lists.
  • Ransomware Shield. It blocks ransomware and other untrusted apps from changing, deleting, or encrypting your photos and files.
  • Silent Mode. It works silently without disturbing your work on silent Mode.
  • Advanced Anti-Spam. It can dodge spam and other malicious content, so you can focus on the emails which genuinely matter.
  • Network Security. It offers advanced network security ever to Home Network.
  • Automatic Maintenance. Tracks and optimizes six critical areas of your PC, including broken shortcuts, browser cache, disk junk, and tracking cookies.
  • Anti-phishing. It protects your device from all malicious content in the form of phishing emails, webs, and apps. So whenever fraudulent mail appears genuine but contains dangerous material, Panda Antivirus 2022 automatically puts it to spam, thus helping you stay safe.
  • Optimized Scan. It provides advanced and optimizes Scans to your PC or devices, which secure your PC from all harmful Viruses.
  • Disk Cleaner. It removes junk from over 200 applications and Windows features.
  • Intelligent Antivirus. It detects and blocks viruses, malware, spyware, ransomware, and phishing. In addition, we use smart analytics to stop threats before they affect you.
  • Sleep Mode. It offers breakthrough patented technology that speeds up your PC by safely putting programs to sleep when not required.
  • Cyber-Capture. It automatically sends suspicious files for analysis in the cloud and pushes a cure to all Avast users if it’s a threat.
  • Behaviour Shield. It spot and blocks suspicious behavior patterns for zero-second protection against unknown threats and ransomware.
  • Webcam Monitoring. It prevents strangers from watching you via your webcam. It keeps spies and snoops off your PC webcam and always monitors and protects it from hijacking.
  • Vulnerability Protection. It gives protection from all Vulnerable Websites and Ads.
  • Provide secure Websites. It also avoids fake websites for safer online shopping and banking.
  • Playing Mode / Multimedia. Enjoy the multimedia universe and play without any difficulty! But, of course, you won’t miss the Antivirus.
  • Safe Panda Browser (Sandboxing). Using the secure browsing function (sandboxing-” sandbox), “surf the web without any danger.
  • Automatic Upgrade. It will update your apps against security gaps.
  • Panda USB Vaccine. It protects against infections on the Laptop and USB devices.
  • Digital Taskboard. Use the virtual keyboard to write your passwords in protected Mode.

Panda Antivirus Pro Full Version Download

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack With Activation Code [Latest] FreePanda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack With Activation Code [Latest] Free

What’s New in Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack?

  • It improved scanning quality.
  • The impressive speed of scanning means the new version decreases the scanning time.
  • Enhanced firewall and now enjoy the active protection while web browsing.
  • AI technology detects the most advanced threats that remain on your PC.
  • Advanced technology helps to reduce the PC load and closes the unused apps.
  • The new version comes with a changed UI and improved graphics.
  • Auto-update and the new version have the latest database for advanced malware removal.
  • Quarantine file restoration changes.
  • Also, Creators Fall compatible.
  • Other improvements and bug fixes.

System Requirements:

  • OS: Windows 10/8/7/Vista (32/64 bit).
  • Processor: Pentium 300 MHz.
  • RAM: 256MB Minimum.
  • HDD: 512MB.
  • Internet connection for updating.

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Activation Code

OIGT76-HRJTG-KYOIU0-K9YTHR

54ERH-67KY9-NULIO-UNYB8MT

6G45-4ECVRH-B8KYUMI-POIMN

JUBYMG-JVTFRD-G5XESF-4ZXGS

DCRHT-FVYBGU-NHIJM-OPLBKYI

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 License Key

CR5XEF4-WZD3Q-45EGR6HC

7JV8KB-UH9ILJJN-UKWJB8YJ

6RG5EX-RCH6TVJB-8UHN9IV

KBYUGJF-HDXE5DC-RHFTVG

NBKYUG-RHT4SXE-5DCRFTV

KHUIMO-NBKYTRD-S4EX5DR

How to Install?

  1. Firstly, download Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack RAR file.
  2. Afterward, extract the downloaded RAR file.
  3. Now forced to run the setup file.
  4. Further, complete the installation procedure.
  5. Then closes the program entirely.
  6. Turns off your internet connection.
  7. Finally, use the given keys for the PRO version.
  8. All done, open the program, and feel more reliable and safer.

Summary

Reviewer

Usman SB

Review Date

Reviewed Item

Panda Antivirus Pro 2022

Author Rating

Software Name

Panda Antivirus Pro Crack

Software Name

Win/Mac/Android

Software Category

Antivirus

Tags:Download Panda Antivirus Pro Full Crack, Panda Antivirus Activation Code Crack, Panda Antivirus Full Version Key, Panda Antivirus Lifetime Crack, Panda Antivirus PC Free Download, Panda Antivirus Pro 2021 Activation Code, Panda Antivirus Pro 2021 Crack, Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Activation Code, Panda Antivirus Pro 2022 Crack, Panda Antivirus Pro Activation Code 2021, Panda Antivirus Pro Activation Code 2022, Panda Antivirus Pro Crack, Panda Antivirus Pro Download, Panda Antivirus Pro Free Download, Panda Antivirus Pro Full Crack, Panda Antivirus Pro Full Download, Panda Antivirus Pro Full Version, Panda Antivirus Pro Full Version Key, Panda Antivirus Pro License Key, Panda Antivirus Pro Patch, Panda Antivirus Pro Serial Key Free, Panda Antivirus Pro With Crack

Источник: https://crackedlink.com/panda-antivirus-pro-crack-key-free/

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, adobe premiere pro 2020 v14 - Free Activators the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle hitmanpro alert activation - Crack Key For U that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography Snap Art 4.1.3.268 Free Download with Crack American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community . a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted AdGuard Premium 7.5.3430 License key Crack (PC/Android) several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,280 articles, 42,573,941 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in progdvb 2018 - Activators Patch in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia . are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users . 524 people . And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,280

Cebuano 6,061,619

Swedish 2,872,837

German 2,633,512

French 2,374,985

Dutch 2,071,672

Russian 1,771,487

Spanish 1,731,929

Italian 1,726,585

Polish 1,496,935

Egyptian Arabic 1,378,106

Japanese 1,301,041

Vietnamese 1,270,100

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,658

Arabic 1,143,507

Ukrainian 1,123,328

Portuguese 1,077,410

Persian 846,692

Catalan 689,830

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red Americas.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization . his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice . and . his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians . remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red Americas.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency . We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority . (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome)

Handy and approachable antivirus solution that uses cloud assistance to prevent, detect and eliminate infected files while remaining light on resources

Panda Free Antivirusis a very simple-to-use anti-malware application that resorts to cloud technology to rapidly find and prevent Trojans, worms, viruses, spyware, adware and other forms of malicious activity, without sacrificing PC performance. It has been warmly received by the user community in the past, and the latest edition offers a more accessible approach to malware scanning and virus detection.

Speedy installation with third-party offers

The setup procedure takes little time to finish. However, users should be careful when going through the wizard stages, as Panda Free Antivirus offers to download and install third-party utilities that it does not actually need to work properly. By paying a little attention, they can be avoided. In addition, it automatically creates an entry into the Windows Explorer right-click menu, although this is not mentioned anywhere in the setup.

Basic security measures for real-time protection

Panda Free Antivirus is deployed along with Panda Dome, a centralized app to help you manage all the Panda products associated to your account from a single interface. In other words, Panda Free Antivirus is active even if you choose not to login to your Panda account or don't own such an account.

The antivirus ensures real-time protection against various types of threats. Statistics show the total files scanned and quarantined, along with blocked threats. Users may access the scanning module, monitor active processes for suspicious activity, deflect USB-based virus attacks, as well as create an emergency boot USB drive in case Windows refuses to start.

Various scanning modes and customization

Panda Free Antivirus can perform a full checkup on the computer for malware agents, verify only popular hiding areas in critical scan mode, look only into specific directories and drives, as well as quickly scan selected files, folders and drives via the Windows Explorer context menu.

Novices may apply the default configuration with optimized settings when performing scan jobs, while advanced users have the possibility of tinkering with this arrangement when it comes to compressed files, behavioral blocking, automatic virus neutralization, alerts, exclusions, and so on. The real-time guard can be deactivated at any time, while scans can be scheduled to run automatically.

Performance and conclusion

Our most recent tests have revealed that Panda Free Antivirus does an excellent job when it comes to identifying infected files while remaining light on system resources. However, it may take a very long time to get rid of them, depending on their volume. The way we see it is that regular users who do not usually explore the depths of the Internet will most Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer be satisfied with Panda Free Antivirus, but the adventurers will probably turn their heads to something more reliable.

Filed under

Malware ScannerVirus ScanFree AntivirusPandaAntivirusScanRemover

Download Hubs

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome) is part of these download collections: Free Antivirus

Panda Free Antivirus (Panda Dome)was reviewed by Elena Opris
Источник: https://www.softpedia.com/get/Antivirus/Panda-Cloud-Antivirus.shtml
Panda Free Antivirus 2020 Download Offline Installer

Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/ioion.us/antivirus/panda-free-antivirus-2020-download-offline-installer.php on line 117

Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/ioion.us/antivirus/panda-free-antivirus-2020-download-offline-installer.php on line 117

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *